Real Life is Not a Romance Novel
68This Is NOT How it Should Be
And It's a Good Thing
Picture this: a beautiful, busty maiden sits on a beach, her lustrous locks blowing in the magical salt breeze, and then he appears. His chiseled jaw juts toward her like the side of a rugged, majestic mountain; his eyes pierce right to her soul and set her heart ablaze! They fall madly in love right that second and, well… fade to black. That’s the picture of perfect romance, right? Well, I have another picture for you: two ordinary, elderly people sitting on a park bench, holding hands. It’s raining and cold, and they only have one scrawny umbrella, but they’re smiling like none of that matters. It probably didn’t happen overnight, and it definitely didn’t happen instantly, but it’s better. It’s real.
Nowadays, we live in a culture of instant gratification. We’re not used to having to wait, but we are used to settling for whatever comes first instead of what might be worth more. You can get Starbucks coffee at McDonald’s, for crying out loud! What does this have to do with romance? Well, if we return to the romance novel example, you might notice that most of those couples fall in “love” after only a few meetings—or worse, a few minutes—and, while there may be trials along the way to happy marriage (or great sex), they never question their love. Does that make any sense? I don’t think so. Why do they believe it, then? Simple: that’s what we’ve been taught. After all, why wait when you can get the “same” thing in thirty seconds? Again, simple: because you can’t.
Why do I say that, you ask? Well, think about the Starbucks coffee. It’s expensive because of their standards: they train their employees to be coffee experts; their beans are top quality; and they believe in the best user experience possible. You can’t get the same thing at McDonald’s, not really, and that’s why theirs is cheaper. Is it easier and faster to get coffee from McDonald’s? Yes. Is it as satisfying? No. The same goes for love. It’s silly to think a lifelong connection can be forged in one magic moment. You don’t buy a suit off the rack and expect it to fit: you take the time to get it tailored so it fits you perfectly. If we’re willing to do that for clothing, why not love? Why do we settle for the first pretty face that comes along? Why can’t we suffer through a few more friends of a friend? Why can’t we wait a few more years before we get married so we can be really sure it’s the true thing before we think we can spend the rest of our lives with that person?
I don’t have the answers to those questions, sadly; all I can do is shake my head and hope that people will wise up sooner or later. As far as I’m concerned, people like that can have their “fairy tale romance” and all the heartbreak it tends to bring. I’m perfectly willing to wait around until the real thing comes along, even if it means if it means I’ll never experience the joy of lust at first sight. I’ll pass on the magic moment: real love brings a lifetime of them.
CommentsLoading...
Love is really self love. By self love i mean giving. Because those who really love understand that this reality is merely an illusion and that includes everything especially so called love. Its just a give and take game. You give something to someone they give back. Thats love. Thats what it is. If you sit around and do nothing love will never come to you ever because it doesn't exist in objective reality. It exists in subjective reality.
I get the point. I do. And to a certain extent I am for what you are saying. I do believe that a long-term, mature love should not be based on the first pretty face that comes along. However, I think romance novels overall are still getting a bad rep, and an outdated one at that. I don't think people should be angry at romance novels and avoid them or look down on their partners for reading them. Hang on! Here is why: If anything, I think that men could benefit from reading their partner's favorite novel, and have a sit down (a romantic candle lit pillow talk maybe?) and discuss what draws their attention and tugs their heartstrings (and loin strings). It can be an avenue that strengthens an intimate relationship. It is just another way to discover the ins and outs of your partner (the same goes for women taking up their man's magazine stash and porn collection, and finding new ways to get inside their man's head, and really tear up the sheets!) If you have an aversion to romance novels, it is due to intimidation, the same way that women are intimidated by porn. It's not the muscle-bound warrior on the cover (or the triple D lubed up blonde spread eagle on a desk) its what is being offered from the person protrayed. The man is hard, but has a soft spot for just one woman, and will do AND DOES anything for her, both in bed and out. The woman is hot blooded and endlessly turned on by the sight smell and taste of one man THE ONE SHE WITH RIGHT NOW. She is not meek in sight or sound, but guttural and has a few deep seated sexual desires of her own. When it all comes down to it, women are comfortable with romance and need to get in touch with the nasty side of life, and men need to get romantic, and lay out rose petals in the backyard and use that KY for an actual massage. Get INSIDE YOUR PARTNER'S HEAD. Be the master at what they want most. Don't make it your goal to eliminate their way of gathering more ideas i.e. expect them to burn their novels or porn (t'aint happening). If you make it a point to fulfill your partners desires, and keep up with the new and changing ones, that IS a mature long-term relationship. And it will last.
Part of my Hubchallenge :)







Truthseeker 18 months ago
Love is very differnt to lust. I wouldn't like to be lusting after a person everytime i see them, just to be in love with them. Love is giving a great feeling. To lust is to want to take from a person. To steal from them and like them only for their physical attributes. Love is spiritual more then physical